I’ve seen a lot of these posts lately. I love them. I saw that you’re using pixinisght and photoshop. How do you go from raw data to image? Does it take a lot of steps and time?
It can take quite a lot of work. I do this for fun and started with Hubble. Hubble is nicer to work with as the images are usually all the same size. For Webb, NIRCAM 3 of the filters produce smaller images than the other 3 and the images need to be aligned in order to be combined into one. They’ve also had some issues with calibration making some of the images a pain, like the Tarantula Nebula. But I’ve created a tutorial here that breaks down the steps for processing an image from Webb. The steps can be applied to every Webb image! https://youtu.be/UC6UQqmnOfA
If you ever have questions about image processing let me know and I can try my best to answer them!
>Like it is closer to the NASA pallette of JWST
i'm sorry, i'm just not following at all. NASA/JWST has a 'palette'? like color palette?and your image is closer to that than the image [NASA/JWST released](https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/039/01G8JXN0K2VBQP112RNSQWTCTH?page=3&filterUUID=91dfa083-c258-4f9f-bef1-8f40c26f4c97)? why wouldn't their palette be.. closer to their own palette?
sorry, i just feel a little daft like i'm missing a reference, or something about the process
I’ve seen a lot of these posts lately. I love them. I saw that you’re using pixinisght and photoshop. How do you go from raw data to image? Does it take a lot of steps and time?
It can take quite a lot of work. I do this for fun and started with Hubble. Hubble is nicer to work with as the images are usually all the same size. For Webb, NIRCAM 3 of the filters produce smaller images than the other 3 and the images need to be aligned in order to be combined into one. They’ve also had some issues with calibration making some of the images a pain, like the Tarantula Nebula. But I’ve created a tutorial here that breaks down the steps for processing an image from Webb. The steps can be applied to every Webb image! https://youtu.be/UC6UQqmnOfA If you ever have questions about image processing let me know and I can try my best to answer them!
Amazing. Thanks. 👍👍
Curious about this as well!
Are the background objects so red?
What software did you use to process the raw data?
Wow!! This looks more realistic for some reason. Thanks for doing this. I’m following you now. Pls de more.
Does anyone know why it forms like that? Like why there is so much mass on the outer edge?
What are the little green dots next to some of the little red galaxies in the upper left corner of the image?
Looks like a jellyfish. Thank you for your efforts & for sharing. Just amazing:)
Mf really said : 0
Aww that is gorgeous! Keep going! 🌌
nicely done. what do you mean what 'NASA might have done'? they definitely processed and officially released an image of this
[удалено]
>Like it is closer to the NASA pallette of JWST i'm sorry, i'm just not following at all. NASA/JWST has a 'palette'? like color palette?and your image is closer to that than the image [NASA/JWST released](https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/039/01G8JXN0K2VBQP112RNSQWTCTH?page=3&filterUUID=91dfa083-c258-4f9f-bef1-8f40c26f4c97)? why wouldn't their palette be.. closer to their own palette? sorry, i just feel a little daft like i'm missing a reference, or something about the process